Evidence on performance
California Telecommunicating Project
Puget Sound Telecommuting Demonstration Project (telework centre
in Seattle)
Puget Sound Telecommuting Demonstration Project (City of Redmond,
WA, USA)
The main idea in telecommuting (teleworking) is taking the work to the
worker rather than the other way round. Even though the idea was introduced
as early as the 1950s it was not until the mid 1990s that the idea of
telecommuting took off. Several factors have been instrumental for the
wide spread acceptance of the concept; emergence of new organisational
shapes, based on flexibility, networking and individualisation of work,
the changing work process, the changing composition of the labour force,
dominated by information workers, and the creation of a non-standard flexible
workforce. In addition the wide spread acceptance of computers as a household
technology occurred in the same period and telecommunications advances
has made possible the transmission of large amount of data anywhere in
the world instantaneously. These forces have given rise to the growth
of acceptance of telecommuting and as a tool for transport demand management.
It is very likely that telecommuting will continue to grow in importance
to the workers in the post-industrial societies and to urban transport.
Three US case studies are presented in detail below. In addition, early
studies in the Netherlands and the US have shown that, for carefully selected
groups of teleworkers, the total number of journeys made could fall by
half or more, with non-work trips also falling, and, in the US study,
total travel distance falling by three quaters as presented in Travel
Reductions for Teleworkers.
|
Netherlands* |
US** |
Trips/day |
-17% |
-51% |
Work trips/day |
-15% |
-91% |
Non work trips/day |
-14% |
-38% |
Am peak trips/day |
-26% |
-73% |
Trip-km/day |
na |
-75% |
* All trips, when 20% of work trips are replaced. Data from Hamer et
al (1991)
** Telecommuting trips only. Data from Pendyala et al (1991)
UK research suggests that around 40% of commuters would prefer to work
at home, and that on average thay would aim to work at home on four days
per week. The current US rate is 2.5 days per week. Based on these surveys,
dodgson et al (1997) provide estimates of the possioble reductions in
car use from teleworking, teleconferencing and teleshopping, as presented
in Potential Trip Changes.
|
2002 |
2007 |
2017 |
Conservative scenario |
|
|
|
Commuting |
-6 |
-11 |
-22 |
Other business travel |
-4 |
-5 |
-10 |
Shopping: cars |
-1 |
-2 |
-4 |
Delivery vans |
+0.1 |
+0.2 |
+0.4 |
Optimistic Scenario |
|
|
|
Commuting |
-9 |
-18 |
-36 |
Other business travel |
-14 |
-20 |
-40 |
Shopping: cars |
-3 |
-6 |
-11 |
Delivery vans |
+0.3 |
+0.6 |
+1.1 |
California Telecommunicating Project
Context
The programme was introduced in 1988 to evaluate the role of telecommuting
in San Francisco, Sacramento and Los Angeles in reducing traffic and air
pollution and to evaluate the reduction of trips. The target group was
state employees. The programme provided options for physically disabled
people. Telecommuting was predominantly home-based using telephone and
PCs. Telecommuters were on the average 41 years. More than half of the
participants (about 150-252) in the programme were men (64%). The number
of days of telecommuting ranged from 1.6 to over 3 days per week. Only
those with over 3 telecommute days per week required a dedicated line
for connecting to computer facilities at work. Most participants had PCs
at home. Laptops were provided to telecommuters.
Impacts on demand
The reduction of work trips due to telecommuting was not offset by the
generation of new non-work trips by telecommuters and their household.
The findings in this project point to potentials for reductions in vehicle
kilometres and reductions in peak period travel by car due to telecommuting.
Those who telecommute choose non-work destinations that are closer to
home.
Impacts on Supply
Not available
Contribution to Objectives
Objective |
Comment |
|
Reductions in car use as the result of telecommuting |
|
By improving sense of community and positive impacts
on local businesses. |
|
The reduction in car use contributes to reductions
in emissions. |
|
Improved access for physically disabled |
|
Not addressed |
|
Not addressed |
|
The cost of implementing was related to the telephone
services for telecommuters |
Puget Sound Telecommuting Demonstration Project (telework
centre in Seattle)
Context
The focus of the programme was on a telework centre that was established
in North Seattle, supporting state employees who normally worked in a
central location (Olympia). The centre was equipped with conference room,
lunchroom, computer room and workstation area. There were on-site hardware
and software support. The project started in October 1990 and was terminated
in January 1992. Altogether 24 telecommuters used the centre. The state
of Washington provided the financial support. More than half used the
centre regularly while others used the centre less than one day in two
weeks. Some preferred to telecommute from home.
Impacts on demand
The centre did not reduce the number of work trips, but did reduce the
number of vehicle kilometres.
Impacts on Supply
Not addressed
Objective |
Comment |
|
Reductions in vehicle kilometres and peak period
travel by car |
|
Not addressed |
|
Reduction in emission related to the decrease in
vehicle kilometres |
|
Not addressed |
|
Not addressed |
|
Not addressed |
|
The state of Washington supported the initiative |
Puget Sound Telecommuting Demonstration Project (City
of Redmond, WA, USA)
Context
The programme was initiated by City of Redmond in 1990. The primary objective
of the programmes was to evaluate the impacts of telecommuting on demand
for travel. There were 10 official participants and 10-15 unofficial participants
in the programme. The technologies used in this programme were PCs, modems,
and standard telephone services for home-based telecommuting. The laptops
were provided by the city.
Impacts on demand
All participants reported a reduction of commute trips amounting to 13-17
percent. The reduction in commute trips did not generate additional non-work
trips among the participants.
Impacts on Supply
Not addressed
Objective |
Comment |
|
The reductions in vehicle kilometres and peak period
travel by car |
|
Not addressed |
|
Reduction in emission related to the decrease in
vehicle kilometres |
|
Not addressed |
|
Not addressed |
|
Not addressed |
|
The City of Redmond supported the initiative |
Gaps and Weaknesses
There are some important gaps and weaknesses in the evidence on the impacts
of telecommuting of travel behaviour. Most demonstration programmes studies
have been limited in scale and only address the short-term impacts of
telecommuting on travel behaviour of the participants in the programme
and their households in some cases. The respondents in these demonstration
programmes are usually carefully selected and their travel behaviour adjustments
might not be representative. The longer-term impacts, in terms of decisions
related to the locations of residence and work are not addressed in these
studies. The projections of reductions in congestion might be an overestimation
in the presence of a latent demand.
|