Taxonomy and description
|
Segregation |
Full Closures |
Half Closures |
Diagonal Diverters |
(Volume Control) |
Median Barriers |
Forced Turn Islands |
One Way |
Integration |
Speed Humps |
|
|
(Speed Control) |
Speed Tables |
Raised Crosswalks |
|
|
Raised Intersections |
Textured Pavement |
Intersection Islands |
|
Roundabouts |
Chicanes |
Realigned Intersections |
|
Intersection Narrowings |
Pinch Points |
Centre Island Narrowings |
|
Chokers |
Gateways |
Planting |
|
Street Furniture |
Bar Markings |
Rumble devices (rumblewave) |
|
Mini Roundabouts |
|
|
(Based on Trafficcalming.org, and complemented from Hass-Klau et al (1992) IHT (1997) and Local Transport Note 1/07) (Note that US and European terminology may differ.)
A combination of segregation measures can create a 'maze' or 'labyrinth', which makes through movement difficult. Their primary purpose is to discourage or eliminate through traffic and hence divert it to surrounding streets. The extra traffic on surrounding streets can add to congestion and environmental intrusion there, and this trade-off needs to be carefully considered at the design stage. However, the maze treatment also reduces accessibility for those living in the area, and this loss of accessibility has often led to the rejection of such measures by the residents whom they are designed to benefit (McKee and Mattingly, 1977). An alternative approach, more often used in city centres, is the traffic cell, in which an area is divided into cells, between which traffic movement, except perhaps for buses and emergency vehicles, is physically prohibited.
Integration measures are designed to encourage the driver to drive more slowly and cautiously. They can be divided into three groups: vertical deflections, horizontal deflections and narrowing. It is clear that these can achieve significant reductions in speed and accidents (Abbott et al, 1995; Barbosa et al, 2000). By making routes through residential areas slower, they can also induce re-routing to major roads, and hence a reduction in environmental impact (Sumner and Baguley, 1979). Such benefits may be offset by increases in congestion and environmental impact on the diversion route.
In contrast to the traffic control measures implemented in the 1980s, ‘shared space’ is achieved by removing all traffic signs, lights and other traffic control devices from the street space. The former are replaced by a streetscape that “speaks” to the driver through surface materials, building enclosure, on-street parking, trees and shrubs, art and decoration. Thus, the daily traffic is regulated by informal social-street rules and responsible travel behaviour. The aim of this approach, developed by the Dutch engineer Hans Monderman, is to enable common use of the available street space. In brief, the shared space concept rests on the idea that taking away traffic regulation elements generates a certain feeling of insecurity, which is assumed to lead to a higher attention level and thus to safer street user behavior.
Traffic calming measures are not dependent on technology, but some categories of vehicles such as buses and emergency vehicles may need protected access into a physically restricted area. Current access control technologies, which permit such vehicles to pass the point without stopping, are covered in regulatory restrictions.