|   
 Policy contribution
 
 
 
         
          | Contribution to key objectives |   
          | Objective | SCOOT | UTOPIA | UTMS | SCATS |   
          | 
 | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | 
 | - | - |   |   |   
          | 
 | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | 
 | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | 
 | 
 | - |   |   |   
          | 
 | - | - |   |   |   
          | 
 | 
 | 
 |   |   |  
 
         
          | Contribution to alleviation 
              of key problems  |   
          | Problem | SCOOT | UTOPIA | UTMS | SCATS |   
          | Congestion-related delay | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | Congestion-related unreliability | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | Community severance  | - | - |   |   |   
          | Visual intrusion | - | - |   |   |   
          | Lack of amenity | - | - |   |   |   
          | Global warming | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | Local air pollution | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | Noise  | - | - |   |   |   
          | Reduction of green space  | - | - |   |   |   
          | Damage to environmentally sensitive sites | - | - |   |   |   
          | Poor accessibility for those without 
              a car and those with mobility impairments  | 
 | 
 |   |   |   
          | Disproportionate disadvantaging of particular 
              social or geographic groups  | - | - |   |   |   
          | Number, severity and risk of accidents 
             | 
 | - |   |   |   
          | Suppression of the potential for economic 
              activity in the area  | - | - |   |   |  Appropriate contexts
 UTC systems are typically implemented in dense urban road networks area 
        over which traffic conditions are monitored by loop detectors and controlled 
        by traffic signals. However the system is also suitable for small networks. 
        It is particularly effective where traffic flows are unpredictable e.g. 
        random changes in traffic patterns such as often occur in popular tourist 
        areas. When junctions are some distance apart (more than about 1 km) isolated 
        junction control using a system such as MOVA may be more appropriate. 
        Other site-specific factors would also influence the decision on method 
        of control. MOVA (Microprocessor Vehicle Actuation) is a modern microprocessor 
        technology for isolated intersections to optimise signal timings. 
         
          | Appropriate area-types |   
          | Area-types | Suitability |   
          | City centre | 
 |   
          | Dense inner suburb | 
 |   
          | Medium density suburb | 
 |   
          | Less dense outer suburb | 
 |   
          | District centre | 
 |   
          | Corridor | 
 |   
          | Small town | - |   
          | Tourist town | 
 |  Adverse side-effects
 If congestion is reduced sufficiently to allow increased speed, risk 
        of accidents will increase. There are no specific safety features unique 
        to most UTC systems. However, longer inter-greens for pedestrians will 
        be effective for safety, so that pedestrian facilities can be required. 
        In principle information from pedestrian detectors could be included in 
        the optimisation process for traffic responsive systems. 
 
 Text edited at the Institute for Transport Studies, 
        University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
 
     |