|
Public transport services
Evidence on performance
Case study 1: Mass Transportation Demonstration Projects in Massachusetts
(1962-64)
Context
Between 1962 and 1964 the Mass Transportation Commission of the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts (MTC) conducted a number of mass transit service improvement
and fare reduction experiments. The experiments centred around Boston
and its inner suburbs, and involved bus operators, other than the Massachusetts
Transit Authority (MTA), throughout the states and commuter railroads
that served Boston.
The bus experiments mostly involved increasing the service frequencies of
a number of local bus services, these are reported in the table
below. The rail experiments were carried out on the Boston &
Maine Railroad (B&M), the New Haven Railroad (NH), with the New York
Central Railroad (NYCR) used as a control. The B&M experiment incorporated
three phases,
- 77% equivalent increase in all services (92% increase in weekday
services) & a 28% equivalent reduction in fares (ranging from 12% to
72%).
- Retention of phase 1 service improvements and virtual elimination
of fares reduction (except for an off-peak reduction).
- Service levels adjusted and fare levels remain the same.
The NH experiment had 2 phases,
- Total average service level increased by 42% and fares reduced by
10% on average.
- Service levels and fares returned to pre-experiment levels, with
off-peak fare incentives retained.
Impacts on demand
Bus Company Experiments
The results in terms of revenue and ridership changes are shown in the
table below "Massachusetts Bus Headway Changes and Ridership/Revene
Results". In all but one case they demonstrated positive increases
in revenue and ridership.
Massachusetts Bus Headway Changes and Ridership/Revenue Results
Route |
Service Area Population |
New Headway |
Results & Comments |
Implied Service Elasticity |
Milford to Downtown Boston |
22,000 (suburban area only) |
1 hour all day (78% service increase) |
12 month revenue up 22% (18% first 3 months; 27% in the last
3 months) |
+0.28 |
Uxbridge to Worcester (pop. 187,000) |
28,000 (suburban area only) |
Similar to above |
9 month revenue up 5% (none in first 3 months, 16% in the last
3 months) |
+0.06 |
Amesbury –Newburyport |
25,000 |
Half hourly in the peak; hourly in the base (67% service increase) |
8 month revenue up 19% (route through depressed industrial areas) |
+0.28 |
Adams – Williamstown |
40,000 |
Better that hourly frequency (100% service increase) |
3 month ridership up 48% |
+0.48 |
Pittsfield |
74,000 (SMSA*) |
Service increased to 8 round trips (16% service increase) |
3 month ridership up 87% (3 mile long radial route) |
+5.44 |
Pittsfield |
74,000 (SMSA) |
Service increased to 15 round trips (50% service increase) |
3 month ridership up 30% (3 mile long radical route) |
+0.6 |
Fitchburg –
Leominster
|
72,000 (SMSA) |
1:40pm to 6.00pm bus trips doubled to give 10 min. headway all
day; minor route extension |
8 month revenue up 8% (high density service area; fare increase
from 20 cents to 25 cents in 9th month) |
n/a |
Fall River |
124,000 (SMSA) |
Service increase of 20% |
Halted but did not reverse ridership decline (high unemployment
and disruptive construction) |
n/a |
* SMSA - US Census Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area
(1960); n/a - not applicable
Source: Adapted from TRB (2003)
The implied service elasticities have a wide range, however two thirds
of the elasticities appear in the +0.28 to +0.6 range.
Rail Experiments
The results in terms of revenue and ridership changes are shown in the
table below,"Masachusetts Rail Headway Changes and Ridership Results".
The key figures to note in terms of service elasticities are those presented
for phase 2 when fares were increased. The increase in patronage was taken
by MTC to infer that improvements in service levels were more effective
at increasing ridership than were fare reductions. Overall the additional
revenues covered the full incremental cost of the experiment.
Massachusetts Rail Headway Changes and Ridership Results
Rail System |
Phase 1 |
Phase 2 |
Phase 3 |
B&M |
+27% increase in ridership |
+37.5% increase in ridership |
+44% increase in ridership |
NH |
+10% increase in ridership |
+11.5% increase in ridership |
n/a |
NYCR |
-5.9% decrease in ridership |
-5.9% decrease in ridership |
-5.9% decrease in ridership |
Source: Adapted from TRB (2003)
Surveys indicated that the majority of passengers on the commuting trains
used to travel by the following modes, own car (63.6%), carpool member
(16.9%), and bus (19.5%).
Impacts on Supply
No cost figures were reported in the TRB publication (2003), however the increase in service levels is likely to have resulted in additional costs from the purchasing/leasing of additional vehicles and hiring of additional operating staff.
Contribution to Objectives
Objective |
Contribution to objective |
Comment |
|
|
Evidence indicated that a reduction in car use
is likely to have contributed to an efficiency improvement by reducing
road congestion. |
|
|
The reductions in car use are likely to have contributed
to a liveability improvement. |
|
|
The reductions in car use will have contributed
to a reduction in environmental impacts. |
|
|
Whilst no direct evidence was presented the increase
in services is assumed to have had a sizeable impact upon equity
and social inclusion. |
|
|
The reduction in car use will have contributed
to a reduction in accidents. |
|
|
The generalised cost of travel by public transport
will be reduced directly by the improved service level. Furthermore,
mode switch from car may reduce congestion levels so leading to
further reductions in travel time. These two impacts may increase
productivity. On the other hand increased subsidy was necessary
and the requisite increase in local taxes may stifle economic growth. |
|
|
No information given
for the bus elements of the experiment but the low elasticities
suggest that costs will not have been covered. The higher elasticities
for the rail services meant that increased revenue covered the cost
of the increased services. |
|
= Weakest
possible positive contribution, |
|
= strongest
possible positive contribution |
|
= Weakest
possible negative contribution |
|
= strongest
possible negative contribution |
|
=
No contribution |
Case Study 2: Frequency and Service Hours Enhancements in Santa Clarita,
California
Context
Santa Clarita is an outlying suburb of Los Angeles in California (U.S.)
with a population of around 150,000 that is served by a metrolink commuter
rail service and local bus coverage. Between 1992 and 1998 there were significant
extensions to public transport service hours and service frequencies. These
are outlined below:
- 1992 - Saturday services expanded by 3 hours, i.e. larger operating
period.
- 1992 - Weekday service hours expanded by 2 hours, i.e. larger operating
period.
- 1994/5 - New express commuter bus services added.
- 1995 - Weekday services expanded on three routes.
- 1995/8 - 30 minute all day headways introduced on 4 routes (including
2 on a weekend) and 15 minute peak headways on two routes.
In addition a 90 minute pass was introduced in 1992, fares raised by 33%
in 1993, youth passes rose to $15 from $10 in 1996, and Sunday services
introduced on about two thirds of local routes.
Impacts on demand
The increase in both bus miles and bus hours over the five years in question
has seen a greater than proportionate rise in ridership. The lack of statistical
smoothing of short run anomalies however, means that not much weight can
be placed upon the yearly elasticities. More reliance can be placed on
the long run elasticities which are +1.14 for bus miles and +1.55 for
bus hours.
Santa Clarita, CA Local Fixed Route Performance and Log Arc Service Elasticities
Local Fixed
Routes-Year
|
City
Population
|
Annual
Bus Hours
|
Annual
Bus Miles
|
Annual Bus
Rides
|
Bus Hours
Elasticity
|
Bus Miles
Elasticity
|
FY 1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
|
123,400
124,000
124,300
124,800
n/a
n/a
|
48,778
53,391
60,028
62,750
66,947
81,216
|
787,807
1,018,021
1,163,607
1,179,140
1,389,082
1,569,891
|
769,137
915,869
1,107,587
1,366,537
1,527,253
1,693,173
|
-
+1.93
+1.62
+4.74
+1.72
+0.53
|
-
+0.68
+1.42
+15.84
+0.68
+0.84
|
5 fiscal years |
+2% (4 yrs*) |
+66% |
+99% |
+120% |
+1.55 |
+1.14 |
FY - Financial Year: * - Calendar years 1992 (122,949 population)
through to 1996 (125,153 population)
Source: TRB (2003)
Impacts on Supply
No cost figures were reported, however the increase in service levels
is likely to have resulted in additional costs from the purchasing/leasing
of additional vehicles and hiring of additional operating staff.
Contribution to Objectives
Objective |
Contribution to objective |
Comment |
|
|
No direct evidence was provided, however it is
likely that some modal shift has occurred, reducing congestion costs
and improving efficiency. The generalised cost of bus travel will
have also declined. |
|
|
No direct evidence was provided, however it is
likely that some modal shift has occurred and that this has led
to an improvement in liveable streets. |
|
|
No direct evidence was provided, however it is
likely that some modal shift has occurred, leading to a reduction
in environmental externalities. |
|
|
The extension of service will have opened up a
wider range of services, goods and opportunities to those on low
incomes. |
|
|
No direct evidence was provided, however it is
likely that some modal shift has occurred, which is likely to have
lead to a reduction in accident rates. |
|
|
No direct evidence was provided but it is likely
that the improved service levels with no increased subsidy requirement
will have been beneficial for the local economy. |
|
|
The high service level
elasticities suggest that increased fare revenue will have more
than covered the cost of increased service provision. |
|
= Weakest
possible positive contribution, |
|
= strongest
possible positive contribution |
|
= Weakest
possible negative contribution |
|
= strongest
possible negative contribution |
|
=
No contribution |
Further Evidence on service level Elasticities
Public Transport Elasticities: Time For A Re-Think (Preston, 1998)
Preston (1998) used evidence taken from an English Metropolitan area
to estimate short and long run bus service elasticities over various time
periods. The data had been collected by the area Passenger Transport Executive
(PTE) using continuous on-vehicle surveys and consisted of 4 weekly bus
usage data by ticket type and time of day (3,822 observations) covering
the periods 1987/88 to 1992/93.
The estimated service elasticities are presented in the table below “Elasticity
Estimates for Adult Bus Users in a Metropolitan Area".
Elasticity Estimates for Adult Bus Users in a Metropolitan Area
Time Period |
Service Short Run |
Service Long Run |
Early morning |
+0.38 |
+0.56 |
Peak am |
+0.36 |
+0.58 |
Inter-peak |
+0.17 |
+0.30 |
Peak pm |
+0.32 |
+0.42 |
Late |
+0.35 |
+1.95 |
Saturday |
+0.52 |
+0.67 |
Sunday |
+1.05 |
+1.67 |
Source: Preston (1998)
The service elasticities appear to be intuitively correct for the peaks
(inelastic), and the inter-peak, which is more elastic. Early morning
trips are also very inelastic, which probably reflects the dominance of
work trips at that time of day. The service elasticities on Sundays and
late at night are very high in the long run, however, the confidence interval
around these estimates is also very large, suggesting they are unreliable.
Further evidence on service level elasticities (The Demand for
Public Transport: a practical guide, 2004)
The service level elasticities presented in the two tables below have
been derived from a number of studies conducted throughout the UK for
bus services.
Service elasticities, with the range and standard deviation according
to average values – bus (TRL 2004)
Time period |
Elasticity |
Range |
Standard deviation |
Number of measurements |
Short run |
0.38 |
0.10 to 0.74 |
0.135 |
27 |
Long run |
0.66 |
0.22 to 1.04 |
0.275 |
23 |
Service elasticities, with the range and standard deviation according
to average values – rail (TRL 2004)
Time period |
Elasticity |
Range |
Standard deviation |
Number of measurements |
Time period not stated |
0.49 |
0.33 to 0.65 |
0.23 |
2 |
Short run |
0.75 |
0.65 to 0.90 |
0.13 |
3 |
The table below presents price and service level elasticities for rail
demand in Spanish cities. It is clear that customers are more responsive
to service level changes than price changes.
Price and service level elasticities for Spanish cities - bus
(Arsenio 2000) (taken from TRL 2004)
Elsaticity |
Large cities |
Small cities |
Price |
-0.3 |
-0.32 |
Service quantity (train km) |
0.78 |
0.39 |
The table below presents elasticities with respect to wait time (a function
of headway) for bus based on analysis of data in 23 UK towns.
Elasticities with respect to wait time – bus
Dependent variable |
Time period/destination |
Elasticity with respect to wait time |
Total trips |
|
-0.64 |
Adult trips |
|
-0.74 |
Adult trips |
Peak/town centre |
-0.65 |
Adult trips |
Off-peak/town centre |
-0.85 |
Adult trips |
Peak/other |
-0.39 |
Adult trips |
Peak/town centre |
-1.17 |
Total trips |
Peak/town centre |
-0.64 |
Total trips |
Off-peak/town centre |
-0.64 |
Total trips |
Peak/other |
-0.50 |
Total trips |
Peak/town centre |
-1.05 |
The Transportation Research board interim handbook (Pratt et al, 2000)
found the following fare and service elasticities in the period 1985 to
87 when fare and service changes were introduced.
Fare and service elasticities – Dallas
|
Fare elasticity |
Service elasticity |
Urban bus |
-0.35 |
0.32 |
Suburban express bus |
-0.26 |
0.38 |
Suburban local |
-0.25 |
0.36 |
The isotope research study (European commission, 1997) reported Service
elasticity is for bus in a number of European cities by city sides (small:
population less than 500,000)
Service elasticities for bus in European cities
|
Small city |
Large city |
Service elasticity |
0.33 |
0.49 |
Gaps and Weaknesses in the Evidence
Changes in service levels are likely to impact upon motorists and other
travel and even location decisions in the very long-term. The difficulty
is that the greater the length of time period that I studied them the
greater the number and magnitude of confounding factors. Long-term impacts
are therefore very difficult to derive despite the fact that they may
well be very much greater than short to medium-term impacts.
It was difficult to find completed studies looking at the quality aspect of public transport services. There was information readily available about various schemes such as quality bus partnerships; however results on the impacts proved to be limited.
|