Objective |
Odense, Denmark |
Norwegian Bicycle Towns |
Cycle network in three Norwegian towns |
|
|
? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The feeling of security is included
Contribution to alleviation of
key problems |
Problem |
Odense, Denmark |
Norwegian Bicycle Towns |
Cycle network in three Norwegian towns |
Congestion-related delay |
|
|
|
Congestion-related unreliability |
|
|
|
Community severance |
|
|
|
Visual intrusion |
|
|
|
Lack of amenity |
|
|
|
Global warming |
|
|
|
Local air pollution |
|
|
|
Noise |
|
|
|
Reduction of green space |
|
|
|
Damage to environmentally sensitive sites |
|
|
|
Poor accessibility for those without a car and
those with mobility impairments |
|
|
|
Disproportionate disadvantaging of particular
social or geographic groups |
|
|
|
Number, severity and risk of accidents |
|
|
* |
Suppression of the potential for economic activity
in the area |
|
|
|
*
The feeling of security is included
Appropriate contexts
Cycle routes will be appropriate in all areas where cycle traffic is
in conflict with motorised traffic. Cycle lanes
are most appropriate in dense areas, while cycle routes and tracks for
walking and cycling are most appropriate in less dense areas.
Appropriate area-types |
Area type |
Suitability |
City centre |
|
Dense
inner suburb |
|
Medium density outer suburb |
|
Less dense outer suburb |
|
District centre |
|
Corridor |
|
Small town |
|
Tourist town |
|
Adverse side-effects
Pedestrians might feel insecure when pedestrian
and cycle traffic is mixed. But Danish experiences indicate that both
parties can adapt to each other.
Cycle paths might use urban green space
and road space as well as private property.
Text edited at the Institute for
Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT