|
First principles assessment
Why introduce intelligent transport systems?
Demand impacts
Short and long run demand responses
Supply impacts
Financing requirements
Expected impact on key policy objectives
Expected impact on problems
Expected winners and losers
Barriers to implementation
Why introduce intelligent transport systems?
ITS are a group of innovative tools based on information and communications
technologies applied in the transport sector. Reasons to implement ITS
(ERTICO, 1998b):
- ITS can give significant benefits on the efficiency, safety and environmental
impacts of a city's transport system;
- ITS can lead to cost savings for authorities, operators and users;
- ITS measures can help give the city a modern, high tech image, and
improve the quality of life for citizens;
- ITS programme can strengthen the local economy, help business and
create new jobs.
- The followings describe briefly some of the various ITS tools available
and the benefits they offer (ERTICO, 1998a).
- Advanced traffic management tools ensure that road network capacity
is used to its maximum. For example, Urban Traffic Control systems minimising
delays and controlling queues, "green wave" through traffic
lights for emergency service vehicles, and public transport vehicles
priority over other traffic.
- Electronic payment, access control and automatic enforcement systems
are important and flexible ITS tools for managing a better distribution
of traffic in overcrowded networks.
- Electronic payment systems such as smart cards offer operators more
flexible ticketing, lower administrative costs and better marketing
information. Passengers save time boarding and alighting, and appreciate
the cash-free travel.
- Multi-modal information systems help travellers plan their journey
before leaving home or the office. One telephone call, a quick check
on the website, or even a hand-held terminal can give details of public
transport services, including timetables, fares, interconnection as
well as current service disruptions. With complete, up-to-the-minute
information, people can choose the best way to travel.
- Variable message signs (VMS) display current traffic information or
suggest alternative routes.
- In-vehicle electronic journey planners guide drivers along their route
to any chosen destination, especially useful in an unfamiliar location.
Adding real-time traffic information about current incidents, road works
and special events lets drivers change routes and save time.
- In-vehicle parking information leads drivers to the nearest available
parking spaces, and can even allow them to book and pay in advance.
- Pollution monitoring systems offer cities the opportunity to use traffic
management tools to reduce the levels of pollution caused by traffic.
Telling drivers about the pollution their vehicles are creating also
improves public awareness of the problems.
- ITS tools such as adaptive speed control, and camera systems for speed
and traffic signal enforcement will increase safety of vulnerable road
users, particularly children, elderly people and the disabled.
Demand impacts
The demand impacts of ITS depend on the types of implemented fields, but
ITS can have a tremendous impact on all stages of a journey in terms of
time required. The large amount of information available to ensure wise
travel planning greatly reduces wasted time. Pre-trip information, for
example, enables accurate planning of the most efficient and effective
routes as well as appropriate selection of a public transport option through
real-time itineraries. In-journey information, such as real-time traffic
data and arrival/departure times, increases journey speed and decreases
waiting for public transport (ERTICO).
In addition, drivers also benefit from ITS use in infrastructure, enjoying
speedy (and automatic) toll payments as well as variable message signs
/ ramp metering that warns drivers of potential slowdowns or suggests
alternate routes. Fleet operators can also use ITS to streamline delivery
times thanks to tracking systems, routing systems, electronic weigh-in-motion
and the digital tachograph.
Responses and situations
|
Response |
Reduction in road traffic
|
Expected in situations |
|
|
Decrease in peak by providing better real-time information |
|
|
Reduce overall where reliability of selected roads
improves by providing better real-time information |
|
- |
N/A |
|
|
Where reducing journey times and better real-time
information may attract car users, and may induce re-routing within
the network |
|
- |
Some increase where reducing journey times and better
real-time information may attract car users, but some decrease where
priority for public transport improves reliability |
|
|
Some increase where reducing travel times and better
real-time information may attract car users |
|
- |
N/A |
|
=
Weakest possible response, |
|
=
strongest possible positive response |
|
= Weakest
possible negative response, |
|
= strongest
possible negative response |
|
= No response
|
Short and long run demand responses
Most implications of ITS were implemented in recent years, so that it
is difficult to judge their effectiveness in the long run, but expected
impacts might be evaluated.
Demand responses
|
Responses
|
|
1st year
|
2–4 years
|
5 years
|
10+ years
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change job location
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Shop elsewhere
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Compress working week
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Trip chain
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work from home
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shop from home
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ride share
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Public transport
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Walk/cycle
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
=
Weakest possible response, |
|
=
strongest possible positive response |
|
= Weakest
possible negative response, |
|
= strongest
possible negative response |
|
= No response
|
Supply impacts
There will physically be no increase in the supply of road space and
public transport service by applying ITS technologies. However, reduced
journey times and stop start conditions, and rerouting less traffic-congested
roads may in practice increase road capacity. Public transport supporting
systems such as smart cards also will generate benefits for public transport
users. The scale of these impacts is still difficult to judge.
Financing requirements
Some ITS technologies need special equipment and communication networks
for utilising technology effect such as non-stop payment system on a toll
road network. This will require the vast initial infrastructure cost.
Others also need the costs to research and develop a new technology. These
estimated costs of the investment will be strongly influenced by both
the technical specification and amount of equipment required. It is very
difficult to define the technological specification, but the key factors
affecting the volume of equipment required is as follows (Perrett and
Stevens, 1996):
- the geographic coverage required
- the density of beacons
- the requirement for gantries on which to mount beacons
- the design of the centralised architecture
- the penetration of installation of in-vehicle equipement
The following total costs have been estimated at 1994 prices for common
ITS infrastructure(Perrett and Stevens, 1996).
|
Capital cost |
Annual operating cost |
Cost of beacons |
£ 500m |
£ 60m |
Cost of gantries |
£ 1,700m |
£ 90m |
Cost of centralised architecture |
£ 400m |
£ 200m |
Cost of in-vehicle equipment |
£ 1,200m |
£ 100m |
Total implementation cost |
£ 3,800m |
£ 450m |
Expected impact on key policy objectives
ITS have potential to contribute to all of key objectives according to
the own specific objective, but the scale of contribution is dependent
on the types of implemented fields.
Contribution to objective
|
Objective
|
Scale of contribution
|
Comment
|
|
|
By reducing journey time, improving reliability and rerouting
a less congested roads
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
By reducing air pollution
|
|
|
By improving public transport conditions
|
|
|
By reduction in the number of road casualties
|
|
|
By freeing up potentially productive time currently involved in
delays
|
|
|
By investment and operating technological equipment
|
|
= Weakest
possible positive contribution, |
|
= strongest
possible positive contribution |
|
= Weakest
possible negative contribution |
|
= strongest
possible negative contribution |
|
=
No contribution |
Expected impact on problems
Contribution to alleviation of key problems
|
Problem
|
Scale of contribution
|
Comment
|
Congestion-related delay
|
|
By using less congested routes for providing real-time traffic
information
|
Congestion-related unreliability
|
|
By using less congested routes and knowing reliable arrival time
to destination for providing real-time traffic information
|
Community severance
|
-
|
-
|
Visual intrusion
|
-
|
-
|
Lack of amenity
|
-
|
-
|
Global warming
|
|
By reducing stop start conditions such as electronic toll collection
system or offering pollution monitoring
|
Local air pollution
|
|
By reducing stop start conditions such as electronic toll collection
system or offering pollution monitoring
|
Noise
|
-
|
-
|
Reduction of green space
|
-
|
-
|
Damage to environmentally sensitive sites
|
-
|
-
|
Poor accessibility for those without a car and those with mobility
impairments
|
|
By enhancing the reliability of public transport and improving
specialist modes
|
Disproportionate disadvantaging of particular social or geographic
groups
|
|
By enhancing the reliability of public transport
|
Number, severity and risk of accidents
|
|
By enhancing safety or reducing traffic accidents
|
Suppression of the potential for economic activity in the area
|
|
By improving the efficiency of the local road network and parking
supply and by improving an area's image
|
|
= Weakest
possible positive contribution, |
|
= strongest
possible positive contribution |
|
= Weakest
possible negative contribution |
|
= strongest
possible negative contribution |
|
=
No contribution |
Expected winners and losers
Each ITS instrument would generally be introduced to improve specific
objectives such as efficiency, environment and safety. This will induce
more winners than losers.
Winners and losers
|
Group
|
Scale of contribution
|
Comment
|
Large scale freight and commercial traffic
|
|
May benefit from reduced journey times and better information
on routes or areas used by freight vehicles for ITS based fleet
management systems.
|
Small businesses
|
|
May benefit from reduced journey times and offering a better and
more efficient service.
|
High income car-users
|
|
May benefit from reduced journey times, increased safety and better
information even if some ITS tools are very expensive to use.
|
People with a low income
|
|
May benefit from reduced journey times, increased safety and better
information, but purchase of some ITS tools need to pay high price.
|
People with poor access to public transport
|
|
By increasing access to various transport service on the multi-modal
information systems.
|
All existing public transport users
|
|
May benefit from the introduction of electronic payment systems
or automatic vehicle location systems to guide the bus location.
|
People living adjacent to the area targeted
|
|
May benefit from reduced journey times, increased safety and better
information, but the level of benefit is lower than ITS tools users.
|
People making high value, important journeys
|
|
Where these journeys such as emergency vehicles will have higher
values of time, so that they may be selected as priority vehicles.
|
The average car users
|
|
May benefit from reduced journey times and better information
by route guidance systems
|
|
= Weakest
possible positive contribution, |
|
= strongest
possible positive contribution |
|
= Weakest
possible negative contribution |
|
= strongest
possible negative contribution |
|
=
No contribution |
Barriers to implementation
Scale of barriers
|
Barrier
|
Scale
|
Comment
|
Legal
|
-
|
There are usually no obvious legal barriers to the introduction
of ITS.
|
Finance
|
|
In many cases, the significant cost of the communication infrastructure
would be borne by the application. However, ITS might lead to cost
savings for authorities, operators and users in the long term.
|
Political
|
|
There are usually few political barriers to the introduction of
ITS. However, some ITS tools might be difficult to accept for users
when they need to pay high user charges or buy expensive instruments
to use these ITS systems.
|
Feasibility
|
-
|
Feasibility studies such as cost benefit analysis and financial
analysis are required to introduce ITS.
|
|
=
minimal barrier, |
|
=
most significant barrier |
Text edited at the Institute for Transport Studies,
University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
|