  
        
        
         
        
        
        
      
        
      
        
      
       
     | 
    
      
       Personalised journey planning
       
      
       
      Summary 
       
      Personalised  journey planning (PJP) is a highly targeted measure to achieve reductions in  car use. Personalised journey planning works with individuals (usually across a  specified geographical area) to provide information on alternatives to the car  for the trips that they make, and encourage use of those alternatives.  Personalised journey planning falls under the umbrella of public awareness  campaigns (Smarter Choices in the UK and sometimes Travel Smart elsewhere).  These campaigns can range from passive advertising to a wide audience to PJP.  It is also possible to implement multiple Smarter Choices simultaneously, such  that each enhances the performance of another, e.g., advertising can support a  PJP programme.  
      There are a number of steps on the way to achieving a reduction in car  use, which can be tackled through a PJP programme. These include problem  awareness, accepting responsibility, perception of alternatives, evaluation of  alternatives, making a choice, experimental behaviour and habitual behaviour  (TAPESTRY, 2003). It should also be  noted that having made a change, habitual drivers can relapse into old travel  patterns. Relapse may occur if individuals do not feel supported, they feel  they are making changes in isolation, the alternatives they are using do not  adequately meet their needs or involve too much effort, or they perceive that  the need to use cars less has receded. Such relapses may not be permanent.  Individuals can cycle through the stages of change several times. The change  may be longer lasting each time until it becomes habitual. 
      Demand impacts resulting  from PJP may be small initially (although this depends on other policy  instruments), but are incremental over time as more campaigns are implemented.  Contributions to achieving policy objectives are therefore mainly positive. 
       
        
       
       
        
  
      
        |